CEV Champions League Table
Group A
| Pl | W | L | Pts | |||
| 1 | Jastrzebski | 6 | 6 | 0 | 18:2 | 18 |
| 2 | Friedrichshafen | 6 | 4 | 2 | 13:11 | 10 |
| 3 | Montpellier | 6 | 1 | 5 | 9:15 | 5 |
| 4 | Vojvodina | 6 | 1 | 5 | 4:16 | 3 |
Group B
| Pl | W | L | Pts | |||
| 1 | Halkbank | 6 | 5 | 1 | 16:8 | 13 |
| 2 | BR Volleys | 6 | 4 | 2 | 13:9 | 11 |
| 3 | Zawiercie | 6 | 3 | 3 | 12:11 | 10 |
| 4 | Hebar | 6 | 0 | 6 | 5:18 | 2 |
Group C
| Pl | W | L | Pts | |||
| 1 | Lube Civitanova | 6 | 6 | 0 | 18:6 | 16 |
| 2 | Tours | 6 | 3 | 3 | 12:10 | 10 |
| 3 | Roeselare | 6 | 3 | 3 | 12:13 | 8 |
| 4 | Benfica | 6 | 0 | 6 | 5:18 | 2 |
Group D
| Pl | W | L | Pts | |||
| 1 | Trentino | 6 | 6 | 0 | 18:4 | 17 |
| 2 | Kedzierzyn-Kozle | 6 | 4 | 2 | 15:9 | 12 |
| 3 | Karlovarsko | 6 | 2 | 4 | 10:12 | 7 |
| 4 | Menen | 6 | 0 | 6 | 0:18 | 0 |
Group E
| Pl | W | L | Pts | |||
| 1 | Perugia | 6 | 6 | 0 | 18:4 | 18 |
| 2 | Ziraat Bankasi | 6 | 3 | 3 | 12:13 | 7 |
| 3 | ACH Ljubljana | 6 | 2 | 4 | 11:14 | 8 |
| 4 | Duren | 6 | 1 | 5 | 6:16 | 3 |
Ranking of third-placed teams
| Pl | W | L | Pts | |||
| 1 | Zawiercie | 6 | 3 | 3 | 12:11 | 10 |
| 2 | Roeselare | 6 | 3 | 3 | 12:13 | 8 |
| 3 | ACH Ljubljana | 6 | 2 | 4 | 11:14 | 8 |
| 4 | Karlovarsko | 6 | 2 | 4 | 10:12 | 7 |
| 5 | Montpellier | 6 | 1 | 5 | 9:15 | 5 |
Outrights
1. Perugia: 1.5 (54.46 %)2. Jastrzebski: 5.04 (16.25 %)3. Kedzierzyn-Kozle: 5.92 (13.84 %)4. Halkbank: 14.83 (5.52 %)5. Lube Civitanova: 18 (4.55 %)6. Trentino: 20 (4.1 %)7. Friedrichshafen: 81 (1.01 %)8. Berlin Recycling Volleys: 301 (0.27 %)
